In a sign of fiscal health, Jersey
City is taking a pass on applying for supplemental state
aid, a city official said yesterday.
The deficit in the budget introduced
by the City Council earlier this month is simply too
small to expect the money, called Municipal Supplemental
Aid, which used to be known as "Distressed Cities Aid,"
said Business Administrator Brian O'Reilly.
By the time the budget is adopted,
O'Reilly said, he expects all the holes to be plugged
with no tax increase.
"If things fall our way we'll be in
good shape," O'Reilly said.
Covering July 1, 2006 to June 30,
2007, the council introduced a $422.6 million municipal
operating budget earlier this month. Of that, $148.9
million is to be raised locally - up $13.9 million from
last fiscal year's $135 million municipal tax levy.
O'Reilly said he's concentrating on
raising revenue to fill the gap.
The city is seeking to renegotiate its
payment in lieu of taxes agreements for properties owned
by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. These
payments have stood at $736,305 since 1988, he said.
Mayor Jerramiah Healy is also seeking
passage of a real estate transfer tax in Trenton, which
could yield another $1 million to $2 million, O'Reilly
said.
The city is also selling property.
Real estate sales to the developers of
the Liberty Harbor North development have already netted
the city $5 million, and another $4 million is expected,
he said. In addition, the city has applied for $2
million in "extraordinary aid" from the state, he said.
Cuts and PILOTS due to come on line
from tax-abated properties should shave another $5
million off the deficit, he added.
Health and pension costs remain the
big ticket items in this year's budget.
Pension payments, which are set by the
state, shot up $8 million for the city's roughly 2,600
employees, while health insurance costs leaped $4
million, O'Reilly said.
City taxpayers are also getting socked
with an additional $7.5 million in local school taxes
every year until the total reaches $63 million, under a
formula worked out by the state, O'Reilly said.
The City Council is expected is to
pass a resolution at its meeting tonight challenging the
formula, he said.
Municipal, county, and school taxes
rose a total of $600 last fiscal year on a property
assessed at $100,000, officials said.
In the can't-miss real estate
market of Jersey City, the city of Jersey City,
well - missed.
Eighteen years ago, the city
purchased 325 Palisade Ave., a three-story
building that city employees worked out of until
about a year ago, for $2.4 million.
Last month, the city auctioned
it off for $1.85 million, taking a $550,000
bath.
City officials attributed the
financial soaking to dilapidated conditions.
"It needs a new roof, it's not
handicap compliant, the HVAC (heating and air
conditioning) system needs to be replaced, it's
a wreck," said Business Administrator Brian
O'Reilly. "We'd have to vacate the building for
a year (to repair it)."
The sale became an issue
Monday night's City Council caucus, when a
stunned Councilman Bill Gaughan, who represents
the Heights neighborhood where the building is,
noted the difference between the purchase and
the sale price.
In order for the transaction
to be considered final, the council has to pass
a resolution tonight confirming the sale.
Gaughan asked O'Reilly to provide more
information about the sale.
"I didn't expect to get much
more," O'Reilly said.
He did estimate that the
property saved the city roughly $8 million in
rent over the past 18 years.
He acknowledged that the city
over the years allowed the property to go
downhill.
"The city is the worst
landlord," he said. "Money was tight in the
'90s."
The city purchased the
building from Secaucus-based T.M.M. Realty in
September 1988. At the auction, held Sept. 12,
it was sold to Due Vecchio, LLC, of West
Caldwell. O'Reilly's office set the minimum bid
price at $1.75 million.
Nearby lots the city owned
were also auctioned to DRG Realty of Jersey City
for $755,000 - representing a $500,000 profit
from the original purchase price, O'Reilly said.
The Jersey City City Council has approved the sale of
$32 million in bonds, part of which will fund ongoing
construction of a new West District police precinct, a
public safety communications headquarters, and a new
firehouse.
The new West District precinct on Communipaw and
Monticello avenues is the first police facility to be
built since the South District precinct was built in
1955.
Police Director Samuel Jefferson said the new $6
million precinct will take roughly two years to complete
and will be equipped with up-to-date security, including
metal detectors and bulletproof vestibules.
A new communications building, to be located on
Bishop Street, will coordinate communications for
police, fire and emergency services, Jefferson added.
The city received an $11 million federal grant to pay
for the communications equipment, he said. The city will
match that amount, earmarking $11 million of the $32
million bond sale to building and outfitting the
facility, Jefferson said.
"This was a long time coming that we needed a
communication center, not just for the Police
Department, also so we can work in conjunction with each
other," Jefferson said.
Roughly $2 million of the bond sale will go toward
the ongoing construction of a new Rescue 1 Fire
Department building, he said.
Although almost half of the bonds will be used to
improve police and fire operations, roughly $7 million
will go to the reconstruction and improvement of several
public parks and fields.
These projects include construction of a pier and sea
wall in J. Owen Grundy Park ($2 million) and a new
swimming pool in Ercel Webb Park ($4 million).
The bonds also will fund the $3.8 million
rehabilitation of the Jersey City Main Library, as well
as provide $1 million for renovations at the Five
Corners, Greenville and Miller branches.
An estimated $250,000 will be used for the
acquisition of new traffic signals and equipment for the
Division of Traffic Engineering and Transportation.
In addition, $2.5 million will pay for the
resurfacing, widening and construction of various public
streets, as well as a city-wide environmental cleanup.
The Division of Information Services will receive new
software and computer equipment, costing $2 million,
while the Incinerator Authority will receive $1.2
million to purchase new vehicles, including several
trucks, two street sweepers and an excavator, officials
said.
City payroll tax, flip tax, hotel tax are in Assembly bills
Monday, June 12, 2006
By JARRETT RENSHAW
JOURNAL STAFF WRITER
Hudson County's Assembly delegation wants to help Jersey City's
ailing budget by giving city officials the power to create new
taxes, including a controversial 1 percent city payroll tax
aimed at companies with 100 or more employees.
The other revenue-generating proposals included in two bills
introduced in the Assembly on June 1 would allow Jersey City to
charge a 1 percent real estate transfer fee on all homes sold in the
city, and would establish a hotel occupancy tax.
But the proposed city payroll tax, which was included in the same
bill as the increase in real-estate transfer fees and is aimed at
the city's newest companies in the Downtown area, is getting a cold
reception from local and state officials.
A payroll tax has been proposed a number of times in the past,
but has always been met with stiff opposition by pro-business
forces. Former Mayor Bret Schundler tried to institute a 1 percent
payroll tax in June 1996, but it was rolled back after the Hudson
County Chamber of Commerce challenged it in court.
The two bills, A-3190 and A-3191, are aimed at cities with at
least 150,000 residents, which includes just Jersey City and Newark.
Mayor Jerramiah Healy, who initially pushed for the bills, called
the hotel tax and the real estate transfer fee "no brainers" Friday,
but stayed away from discussions on the payroll tax.
"We have been looking at reoccurring revenue streams, and many
other cities, including Secaucus, in Jersey collect a hotel tax, so
why not Jersey City?" Healy said. "As for the real estate transfer
fee, it's painless and produces substantial revenue for the city."
Healy claims the real estate transfer fee and the hotel tax would
each generate roughly $3.5 million annually, and he calls those
estimates conservative.
Currently, the state imposes a 5 percent real estate transfer
fee, with roughly 20 percent of the proceeds going to the county and
the rest to the state coffers. The proposed bill would allow Jersey
City to increase the transfer fee from 5 percent to 6 percent and
allow it to keep 1 percent of the revenue.
"It is not a fee, it's a tax," said Joe Hottendorf, executive
director of Liberty Board of Realtors. "This is directly aimed at
homeowners in Jersey City. Why go after people that are bringing ratables to the city? It just doesn't make sense."
Under current law, Jersey City may not collect both a property
tax and a hotel occupancy tax. The legislative proposal, which is
getting the most support of the three because its aimed at
outsiders, would change that.
JARRETT RENSHAW can be reached at jrenshaw@jjournal.com.